CMMC v. Salinas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that distributor, KLR, had “instructed CMMC to arrange with A. Ger-maine, a freight forwarder paid by KLR, to transport the press from CMMC’s factory in Chalonnes, France, to the ship on which it would travel to the United States”
• finding no personal jurisdiction over manufacturer that knew a machine it sold a Texas buyer was being shipped here F.O.B. Houston
• finding no purposeful availment where only marketing efforts to Texas consisted of ads run in national publications having Texas subscribers
• finding no purposeful availment where only marketing efforts to Texas consisted of ads run in national publications having Texas subscribers
• finding no purposeful availment where only marketing efforts to Texas consisted of ads run in national publications having Texas subscribers
• determining there was no jurisdiction and noting that there was no effort to market in Texas except advertisements placed in magazines with national circulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).