C.M.M. v. S.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining review where court used exact language from defendant's request to charge and no exception taken
• declining review where court used exact language from defendant’s request to charge and no exception taken
• reviewing state's alternate ground for affirming Appellate Court's judgment, even though state had not expressly raised as alternate ground for affirmance, without addressing question of whether claim had been raised in Appellate Court
• declining to review claim of induced error where \challenged jury instruction repeated the exact language that the defendant had requested\ [emphasis omitted]
• Golding review is not available for unpreserved claims of induced instructional error
• “[w]hether the Appellate Court properly employed Golding review presents a question of law over which our review is plenary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).