CMM Grain Co., Inc. v. Ozgunduz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a statement of \desire to appeal all rulings and orders of the trial court that dealt with the denial of the offset of benefits\ as insufficient under Rule 34.6(c)(1)
• rejecting a statement of “desire to appeal all rulings and orders of the trial court that dealt with the denial of the offset of benefits” as insufficient under Rule 34.6(c)(1)
• a general statement identifying the portion of the judgment the party intended to appeal is insufficient to satisfy Rule 34.6(c)
• discussing necessity of strict compliance with former rule 53(d)
• discussing necessity of strict compliance with former rule 53(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).