· 10/18/1996
Cmi-Trading, Inc. v. Quantum Air, Inc., and Salvador Esquino
Citations
- 98 F.3d 887
- 45 Fed. R. Serv. 1106
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27797
- 1996 WL 599702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The intent of the parties is an issue within the competence of the jury and expert opinion testimony will not assist the jury, within the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 702, in determining the factual issue of intent.”
- “No expert, however, knows a party’s state of mind.”
- “No expert, however, knows a party's state of mind.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ryan, Norris, Dowd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.