Skip to main content
· 10/18/1996

Cmi-Trading, Inc. v. Quantum Air, Inc., and Salvador Esquino

Citations

  • 98 F.3d 887
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 1106
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27797
  • 1996 WL 599702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The intent of the parties is an issue within the competence of the jury and expert opinion testimony will not assist the jury, within the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 702, in determining the factual issue of intent.”
  • “No expert, however, knows a party’s state of mind.”
  • “No expert, however, knows a party's state of mind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Norris, Dowd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.