Skip to main content
· 9/5/2013

CMH Homes, Inc. v. Thomas Goodner

Citations

  • 729 F.3d 832
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18450
  • 2013 WL 4749906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that “the district court is better equipped to address [fact-intensive questions] in the first instance.”
  • holding that, in a motion to compel arbitration, the amount in controversy is determined “by looking through to ‘the entire, actual controversy between the parties, as they have framed it.’” (quoting Vaden, 556 U.S. at 66)
  • remanding to the district court to calculate the amount in controversy without regard to a stipulation limiting damages and attorneys' fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Shepherd, Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.