Cmax, Inc. v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that a district court’s order dismissing an action after striking a pleading under Rule 12(e) would be final and appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Neveu v. City of Fresno
  E.D. California· 2005-07-15· cited 83×
• United States v. Anchor Line, Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 1964-07-17· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.
  Supreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 999×
• La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.
  Supreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 664×
• Parr v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 350×
• Julius Nagler v. Admiral Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1957-10-02· cited 231×
• Vecchia v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1948-12-23· cited 6×
• Petition of Cmax, Inc. v. Hall
  Ninth Circuit· 1961-03-30· cited 1×