C.M. v. A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a nonunanimous- verdict instruction does not require a new trial when the jury returns unanimous verdicts
• holding that “receipt of a nonunanimous guilty verdict for a nonpetty offense consti- tutes plain error in light of Ramos” (citing State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020))
• affirm- ing two convictions entered on unanimous guilty verdicts, where, after being instructed incorrectly that only 10 jurors needed to agree on a verdict, the jury returned nonunani- mous guilty verdicts on some charges but returned unani- mous guilty verdicts on two charges
• regarding unanimous guilty verdicts returned after erroneous unanimity instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).