Skip to main content
· 2/21/2001

Federal Case

Citations

  • 241 F.3d 374
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a North Carolina statute granting a 60-day limitations period was sufficiently consistent with IDEA policies because the statute contained a notice requirement
  • holding that a North Carolina statute granting a 60-day limitations period was sufficiently consistent with IDEA policies because the statute contained a notice requirement
  • borrowing a 60-day North Carolina limitations period for requesting a due process hearing under IDEA
  • borrowing a 60-day North Carolina limitations period for requesting a due process hearing under IDEA
  • borrowing North Carolina’s 60-day time limit for initiating IDEA administrative proceedings but tolling the statute due to a lack of notice
  • “Logic virtually compels the conclusion that a state special education statute, specifically enacted to comply with the IDEA, constitutes the state statute most analogous to the IDEA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.