Clymer v. Summit Bancorp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the absence of a contrary design, clearly articulated, the Legislature is taken to have a dop ted the expressed intention of the uniform act drafters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kradel v. Piper Industries, Inc.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 63×
• Clymer v. Summit Bancorp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-03-07· cited 33×
• Harry Kradel. v. Piper Industries
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-11-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Town Tobacconist v. Kimmelman
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-07-19· cited 160×
• Twiss v. State, Dept. of Treasury
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-06-24· cited 98×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-09· cited 47×
• Matter of Estate of Dobert
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-03-05· cited 35×
• Wildwood Storage v. Mayor & Council
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-12-01· cited 16×
• Clymer v. Summit Bancorp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-06-10· cited 5×
• Gibson v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-22· cited 5×