Clyde v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there is no presumption that an inadequate warning was the proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries because the plaintiff bears the burden of proving proximate cause
• Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572q(c) requires Plaintiffs to “prove by a fair preponderance of the evidence that if adequate warnings or instructions had been provided, the claimant would not have suffered the harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).