Clyde v. National Data Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• lack of consent required remand where non-consenting defendant’s answer was filed after thirty day period expired and was silent on issue of removal
• “The alleged fact that [the non-petitioning defendant] informed the other Defendants of his consent is insufficient to constitute a joinder under the statute.”
• “His filing of an answer in this court ... is not significant, since the answer was not only silent as to removal but also fell outside the thirty day period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).