Clyde K. And Sheila K., Individually and as Guardians for Ryan K., a Minor v. Puyallup School District, No. 3, Clyde K. Sheila K. v. Puyallup School

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when the court applies the four Rachel H. factors, it looks first to “the academic benefits of placement in a mainstream setting, with any supplementary aides and services that might be appropriate”
• allowing removal where a student engaged in two violent attacks on other students, assault on a staff member, and disruption of class with profanity and sexually explicit remarks
• allowing removal where a student engaged in two violent attacks on other students, assault on a staff member, and disruption of class with profanity and sexually explicit remarks
• placing the 8 burden of proof on the party challenging the administrative ruling
• “The school clearly had the burden of proving at the administrative hearing that it complied with the IDEA”
• “Allocation of the burden of proof has long been governed by the rule that the party bringing the lawsuit must persuade the court to grant the requested relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).