Clyde H. BOOZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unnecessary application of the Medical- Vocational Guidelines was harmless where ALJ’s decision was supported by substantial evidence
• holding that new evidence is material if it “bear[s] 4 || directly and substantially on the matter in dispute,” and if there is a “reasonabl[e] possibility that 5 || the new evidence would have changed the outcome of the . . . determination.”’
• stating that evidence is material “only where 21 there is a reasonable possibility that the new evidence would have changed the outcome of the 22 [Commissioner’s] determination had it been before him”
• concluding error occurred during “unnecessary” procedure
• concluding error occurred during \unnecessary\ procedure
• concluding error occurred during “unnecessary” procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).