Skip to main content
· 6/13/1995

Clyde C. Freeman and Nancy F. Freeman v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Madison National Bank

Citations

  • 56 F.3d 1394
  • 312 U.S. App. D.C. 324
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14479
  • 1995 WL 350235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the anti-injunction provision applies “unless [the conservator] has acted ... beyond, or contrary to, its statutorily prescribed, constitutionally permitted, powers or functions.”
  • court lacked jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment claim that would have “restrained” the FDIC from foreclosing on the plaintiffs’ property
  • court lacked jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment claim that would have “restrained” the FDIC from foreclosing on the plaintiffs’ property
  • Courts lack jurisdiction “where a claimant has failed to initiate an administrative claim.” (cleaned up)
  • citing, inter alia, Heno, supra, 965 F.2d at 1151-52
  • guoting 12 U.S.C.A. § 1821(d)(13)(d)(i)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Silberman, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.