· 5/19/2005
Cluxton v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Cluxton)
Citations
- 327 B.R. 612
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 857
- 2005 WL 1201469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Ohio law to determine whether a mobile home is real property or personalty
- applying Ohio law to determine whether a mobile home is real property or personalty
- applying Ohio law to determine whether a mobile home is real property or personalty
- affirming bankruptcy court’s application of anti-modification provision to secured interest in debtor’s mobile home because under Ohio law, debt- or’s surrender of mobile home’s certificate of title rendered mobile home part of debt- or’s real property
- affirming bankruptcy court’s application of anti-modification provision to secured interest in debtor’s mobile home because under Ohio law, debtor’s surrender of mobile home’s certificate of title rendered mobile home part of debtor’s real property
- “The determination whether a plan provision violates the Bankruptcy Code is a legal conclusion reviewed de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper, Gregg, Latta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.