Skip to main content
· 5/19/2005

Cluxton v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Cluxton)

Citations

  • 327 B.R. 612
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 857
  • 2005 WL 1201469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Ohio law to determine whether a mobile home is real property or personalty
  • applying Ohio law to determine whether a mobile home is real property or personalty
  • applying Ohio law to determine whether a mobile home is real property or personalty
  • affirming bankruptcy court’s application of anti-modification provision to secured interest in debtor’s mobile home because under Ohio law, debt- or’s surrender of mobile home’s certificate of title rendered mobile home part of debt- or’s real property
  • affirming bankruptcy court’s application of anti-modification provision to secured interest in debtor’s mobile home because under Ohio law, debtor’s surrender of mobile home’s certificate of title rendered mobile home part of debtor’s real property
  • “The determination whether a plan provision violates the Bankruptcy Code is a legal conclusion reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper, Gregg, Latta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.