Clum v. Barkley

Citations

• 20 Wash. 103
• 54 P. 962
• 1898 Wash. LEXIS 474

Syllabus

<p>EVIDENCE — NON-EXPERT WITNESSES.</p> <p>The admission of the opinions of non-expert witnesses upon questions of sanity being largely within the discretion of the trial court, error cannot be predicated upon the court’s refusal to permit non-expert witnesses to state whether, in their judgment, an alleged insane grantor was competent to execute the deed in controversy.</p>