Club Sinrock, LLC v. Municipality of Anchorage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff “does not point to any spe cific provisions” of a contract that would entitle him to relief
• determining that it was not in the interest of justice to transfer plaintiff’s claims because, in the court’s view, plaintiffs claims were “unlikely to be meritorious in another court of the United States”
• determining that it was not in the interest of justice to trans- fer plaintiffs claims because, in the court’s view, plaintiffs claims were “unlikely to be meritorious in another, court of the United States”
• declining to transfer the case on the grounds thát the plaintiffs claims were “unlikely to be meritorious in another court of the United States'
• declining to transfer the ease on the grounds that plaintiffs claims “were unlikely to be meritorious in another court of the United States”
• finding that the Court of Federal Claims had no jurisdiction over wrongful forfeiture action under 28 U.S.C. § 2465, regardless whether the forfeiture was an in rem forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881 or a criminal in personam forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 853

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).