Club 400 v. State ex rel. Thetford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the contractor did not waive its claims, as the government had argued, because the contractor objected to the suspension of its timber contract, and because the government did not rely on the contractor’s failure to terminate the timber contract after its suspension
• “[t]he enactment of the ESA ... and the implementation by the Forest Service of ESA requirements ... all constituted sovereign acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).