Skip to main content
· 3/1/1991

Clover v. Snowbird Ski Resort

Citations

  • 808 P.2d 1037
  • 155 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1991 Utah LEXIS 8
  • 1991 WL 26033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury could conclude that blind jump in intermediate trail is not an inherent risk
  • recognizing that a statute should not be construed in piecemeal fashion but as comprehensive whole
  • recognizing that a statute should be read as comprehensive whole
  • recognizing that a statute should be read as comprehensive whole
  • noting that dual purpose rule and substantial deviation test are not departures from Birkner criteria but merely methods of applying criteria in specific factual situations
  • interpreting Utah's Inherent Risk of Skiing Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 78-27-51 to 54 (1992 & 1995 Supp.) (Utah Act)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Howe, Stewart, Durham, Jackson, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.