Nevada Supreme Court· 10/28/1976
Clough v. State
Citations
- 555 P.2d 840
- 92 Nev. 603
- 1976 Nev. LEXIS 681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- doctrine of inevitable discovery applied to primary evidence without discussion
- inevitable inventory search rationale used
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. HoskinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 154×
- People v. StithNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-03-26· cited 101×
- People v. BurolaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-03-29· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. BenoitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-06· cited 76×
- Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-10-14· cited 66×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-19· cited 55×
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-12-22· cited 49×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 41×
- People v. FuentesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-16· cited 10×
- Carlisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1982-03-29· cited 9×
- Shum v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1981-01-20· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.