Skip to main content
· 9/5/1989

Clough v. Adventist Health Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 780 P.2d 627
  • 108 N.M. 801
  • 87 A.L.R. 4th 831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that plaintiffs antitrust conspiracy claim should not survive summary judgment by considering plaintiffs evidence in light of evidence presented by defendants
  • applying sole motive analysis to interference with a doctor’s relationship with patients
  • “[M]ere argument or bare contentions of the existence of a material issue of fact is insufficient.”
  • “[The] mere argument or bare contentions of the existence of a material issue of fact is insufficient.”
  • “[MJere argument or bare contentions of the existence of a material issue of fact is insufficient.”
  • summary judgment proper where defendant had legitimate business purpose for allegedly improper actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Sosa, Ransom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.