Skip to main content
· 4/6/2004

Cloud v. Schenck

Citations

  • 869 So. 2d 709
  • 2004 WL 726826

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because the contract provided sellers with option of retaining deposit or pursuing actual damages, it constituted “a penalty as a matter of law and is invalid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.