Close v. Lucky O. K. Mining Co.

Citations

• 105 Kan. 257
• 182 P. 392
• 1919 Kan. LEXIS 63

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Compensation Act — Injury to Leg — Amount of Compensation. By virtue of the provisions of section 3 of chapter 226 of the Laws of 1917, an injury to a leg may in some instances justify a larger amount of compensation than loss of the leg, and it was not error in this case to follow subdivision 19 of such section, instead of the schedule set forth in subdivision 14 thereof.</p> <p>2. Same — AppeaF-lnsuffiaient Record — Matters Reviewable. The record being confessedly one to be treated as- if no motion for a new trial had been filed, as neither general findings nor ascertained and agreed facts are presented, claims touching excess of judgment, failure to submit to a surgical operation, and the objective character of the injury, involving an examination of conflicting evidence, cannot be considered.</p>