Court of Appeals of Texas· 12/28/2001
Clopton v. Chi-Suk Pak
Citations
- 66 S.W.3d 513
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 8589
- 2001 WL 1671165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellants participated in decision-making events leading to dismissal because their attorney signed joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and subsequent trial court orders granting the agreed motion and dismissing appellants’ claims against appellees
- holding that appellants participated in decision-making events leading to dismissal because their attorney signed joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and subsequent trial court orders granting the agreed motion and dismissing appellants’ claims against appellees
- holding that appellants participated in decision-making events leading to dismissal because their attorney signed joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and subsequent trial court orders granting the agreed motion and dismissing appellants’ claims against appellees
- finding that appellants participated in the decision-making events that resulted in the dismissal order where appellants’ attorney signed a joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and agreed to the dismissal order signed by the trial court
- finding that appellants participated in the decision-making events that resulted in the dismissal order where appellants’ attorney signed a joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and agreed to the dismissal order signed by the trial court
- finding that appellants participated in the decision-making events that resulted in the dismissal order where appellants’ attorney signed a joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and agreed to the dismissal order signed by the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holman, Gardner, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aviation Composite Technologies, Inc. v. CLB Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2004-03-04· cited 54×
- Durham v. ZarcadesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2008-10-30· cited 31×
- Cox v. CoxTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-11-12· cited 31×
- In Re PannellCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-02-25· cited 30×
- Aero at Sp. Z.O.O. v. Dennis Gartman and Jerry K. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-10· cited 20×
- In the Interest of Baby Girl S.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-11-30· cited 13×
- Jackson v. HoffmanTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-04-13· cited 12×
- Ex Parte E.M.P.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2019-03-21· cited 5×
- in the Matter of J.A.G., Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2005-08-11· cited 2×
- De La Rocha v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2011-08-31· cited 2×
- In re Expunction J.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2019-07-03· cited 2×
- Travis Hazlewood v. William LafaversTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2012-12-12· cited 1×
- In Re Jag, Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2005-08-11
- Henrietta Tafoya v. Green Tree Servicing LLC F/K/A Green Tree Financial Servicing Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-12-31
- Rocky F. Anderson v. Christina S. AndersonTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-01-29
- Chartway Federal Credit Union v. David M. GleasonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-06-05
- Lushann International Energy Corp. v. Harris CountyTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-09-11
- the Rainbow Trust and Julie R. Simoncini v. Western American National Bank, N.A.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-08-21
- Stephen F. Ramsey v. Keith Moody and Sandra MoodyTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-07-17
- Matthew A. Travis v. Sabrina D. CoronadoTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-02-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.