Clopton v. Chi-Suk Pak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellants participated in decision-making events leading to dismissal because their attorney signed joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and subsequent trial court orders granting the agreed motion and dismissing appellants’ claims against appellees
• holding that appellants participated in decision-making events leading to dismissal because their attorney signed joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and subsequent trial court orders granting the agreed motion and dismissing appellants’ claims against appellees
• holding that appellants participated in decision-making events leading to dismissal because their attorney signed joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and subsequent trial court orders granting the agreed motion and dismissing appellants’ claims against appellees
• finding that appellants participated in the decision-making events that resulted in the dismissal order where appellants’ attorney signed a joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and agreed to the dismissal order signed by the trial court
• finding that appellants participated in the decision-making events that resulted in the dismissal order where appellants’ attorney signed a joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and agreed to the dismissal order signed by the trial court
• finding that appellants participated in the decision-making events that resulted in the dismissal order where appellants’ attorney signed a joint motion to sever and dismiss with prejudice and agreed to the dismissal order signed by the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).