Clockedile v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retaliation claims are preserved if the retaliation is “reasonably related to and grows out of’ the discrimination charged in the administrative complaint
• retaliation claims that are reasonably related to the filed complaint are preserved and, consequently, do not require EEOC exhaustion
• “retaliation claims are preserved so long as the retaliation is reasonably related to and grows out of the discrimination complained of to the agency—e.g., the retaliation is for filing the agency complaint itself”
• “[Retaliation claims are preserved so long as the retaliation is reasonably related to and grows out of the discrimination complained of to the agen cy — e.g., the retaliation is for filing the agency complaint itself.”
• retaliation occurred after right-to-sue letter issued and shortly before employee filed suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).