Skip to main content
· 6/15/1880

Clinton v. Nelson

Citations

  • 2 Utah 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting division in judicial interpretation but following expansive reading of § 506(c)
  • day of alleged unlawful arrest was the day of accrual of plaintiffs claims contrary to plaintiffs contention that his claims accrued on the date of his arraignment
  • “[T]hou shalt not classify similar claims differently in order to gerrymander an affirmative vote on a reorganization plan.”
  • “Classification of claims ... affects the integrity of the voting process, for, if claims could be arbitrarily placed in separate classes, it would almost always be possible for the debtor to manipulate ‘acceptance’ by artful classification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boeeman, Emerson, Sohaeifrer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.