Skip to main content
· 7/29/2009

Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.

Citations

  • 977 A.2d 892
  • 2009 Del. LEXIS 394
  • 2009 WL 2246302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in reviewing a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6
  • Applying this standard where dismissal was granted under this Court’s Civil Rule 12(b)(6) because action was barred by statute of limitations.
  • affirming trial court’s denial of a motion for default judgment that was based, in part, upon a determination that identical claims against an appearing co-defendant were barred by the statute of limitations
  • applying this rule where dismissal was granted under this Court’s Civil Rule 12(b)(6)
  • explaining the court will not accept “conclusory allegations unsupported by specific facts”
  • ―For personal injury actions, the law of the state where the injury occurred is presumed to control unless another state has a more significant relationship.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.