Skip to main content
· 1/12/1929

Clinton Iron & Steel Co. v. Heiner

Citations

  • 30 F.2d 542
  • 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8453
  • 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 986
  • 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a disparity between incomes and standard of living because of the parties’ decision that the wife’s career would be subordinate to the husband’s, along with other circumstances, justified an award of indefinite support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.