Clingerman v. Sadowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• withdrawals from entireties account for the benefit of only one spouse is misuse of power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clingerman v. Sadowski
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-16· cited 64×
• Gordon's Jewelry Co. of New Jersey v. Goldstein (In Re Goldstein)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-10-30· cited 20×
• Button v. Button
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-29· cited 19×
• In Re Estate of Matson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-29· cited 12×
• Plastipak Packaging, Inc. v. DePasquale
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-26· cited 8×
• Button v. Button
  Erie County Court Common Pleas· 1987-01-06
• Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. DiGregorio
  Mercer County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-04-04

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stemniski v. Stemniski
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-03-23· cited 54×
• Vento v. Vento
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 35×
• Sheridan v. Lucey
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-03-20· cited 35×
• Damirgian v. Damirgian
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-29· cited 11×