Clinger v. Hartshorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “a contract provision which purports to award a non-breaching party an asset valued at substantially more than any actual damage may represent an unenforceable penalty clause”
• stating, “a contract provision which purports to award a non-breaching party an asset valued at substantially more than any actual damage may represent an unenforceable penalty clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Fortner v. Cousar
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1999-12-09· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rathke v. MacFarlane
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-07-19· cited 92×
• Burt v. Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church of Broomfield
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1990-10-25· cited 40×
• Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ v. Keating
  S.D. New York· 1990-12-21· cited 38×
• American Investors Life Insurance v. Green Shield Plan, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1960-12-30· cited 17×
• Proper v. Greager
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-02-13· cited 16×
• Grooms v. Rice
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1967-07-03· cited 11×
• South Washington Associates v. Flanagan
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-01-28· cited 10×
• Yerton v. Bowden
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1988-09-22· cited 6×