Skip to main content
· 6/25/1976

Cline v. Roemer

Citations

  • 551 P.2d 621
  • 97 Idaho 666
  • 1976 Ida. LEXIS 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that relief was unwarranted where the record showed the movant had actual knowledge of the judgment as evidenced by his motion to set it aside and affidavit acknowledging prior notice
  • holding that relief was 6 unwarranted where the record showed the movant had actual knowledge of the judgment as evidenced by his motion to set it aside and affidavit acknowledging prior notice
  • indicating that an extension of the time for an appeal under Rule 77(d), Idaho R. Civ. P., is not appropriate when a party has actual notice of the judgment or order before the time for appeal has run
  • where a party has actual notice that a judgment has been entered, the time for filing of a notice of appeal will not be tolled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.