Clincy v. Galardi South Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that club exercised a “significant amount of control over the[ir] entertainers” when club had a written code of conduct, even though those rules were not imposed “consistently or uniformly”
• finding that club exerted control over its dancers when it had the authority to fine or discipline dancers for violations, even when it did not do so “consistently or uniformly”
• finding that club exerted control over its dancers when it had the authority to fine or discipline dancers for violations, even when it did not do so “consistently or uniformly”
• finding no special skill required even though club preferred prior experience and required dancers to audition
• rejecting the argument that entertainers were not integral to a club because the entertainers were \not it's [sic] essential function\
• finding no special skill required even though club preferred prior experience and required dancers to audition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).