Clinch v. Heartland Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a defendant “enjoys greater latitude to interfere” when the “alleged interference is with expectancy as opposed to an existing” contract
• “Whether a statement is fact or opinion is a question of law, and we make this determination based on the totality of the circumstances surrounding a given statement.”
• “The elements of tortious interference with a business relationship are: (1) The plaintiff was involved in a valid business relationship; (2) the defendant was aware of the relationship; (3
• “The elements of tortious interference with a business relationship are: (1) The plaintiff was involved in a valid business relationship; (2) the defendant was aware of the relationship; (3
• “The elements of tortious interference with a business relationship are: (1) The plaintiff was involved in a valid business relationship; (2) the defendant was aware of the relationship; (3
• “Courts since Nazeri [v. Mo. Valley Coll., 860 S.W.2d 303 (Mo. 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).