Supreme Court of Colorado· 6/17/1991
Climax Molybdenum Co. v. Walter
Citations
- 812 P.2d 1168
- 15 Brief Times Rptr. 831
- 1991 Colo. LEXIS 395
- 1991 WL 103539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing statutory scheme to give consistent, harmonious, and sensible effect to all its parts
- Statutory terms are to be given effect according to their plain and obvious meaning
- “As a general rule, a special or specific statutory provision prevails over a general provision unless the general provision is 5 later in time and the legislature has manifested a clear intent that the general provision should prevail.”
- we must give statutes a reasonable construction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stickley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceTenth Circuit· 2007-10-10· cited 113×
- Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-04-26· cited 94×
- Martinez v. BadisSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-12-14· cited 75×
- Catherine Ulissey, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. Alexander Shvartsman, Defendant-Appellant/crossTenth Circuit· 1995-08-01· cited 61×
- In Re the Marriage of HuffSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-08-24· cited 50×
- Cruz v. BenineSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-09-13· cited 46×
- Gorman v. Tucker by and Through EdwardsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-07-06· cited 41×
- Charlton v. KimataSupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-07-15· cited 40×
- Water, Waste & Land, Inc. v. LanhamSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-03-09· cited 34×
- People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-06-29· cited 33×
- Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-09-12· cited 32×
- Matter of Title, Ballot Title for No. 62Supreme Court of Colorado· 1998-06-08· cited 31×
- Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. King Consolidated Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-03-14· cited 28×
- Qwest Corp. v. Colorado Division of Property TaxationSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-06-24· cited 26×
- People v. DavisColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-04-12· cited 24×
- New Design Construction Co. v. Hamon Contractors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-06-26· cited 21×
- Colorado State Board of Accountancy v. Zaveral Boosalis RaischSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-05-26· cited 19×
- People v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-12-21· cited 19×
- Delta Drywall v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-12-02· cited 18×
- Barela v. BeyeColorado Court of Appeals· 1996-03-21· cited 14×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-01-31· cited 457×
- People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-07-13· cited 185×
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-04-23· cited 100×
- City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-10-15· cited 53×
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-04-30· cited 24×
- Denver v. HansenColorado Court of Appeals· 1982-05-20· cited 16×
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-06-18· cited 15×
- Charnes v. Central City Opera House Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-05-15· cited 10×
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. State Compensation Insurance AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-07-09· cited 8×
- HORIZON LAND CORPORATION v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals· 1974-06-25· cited 7×
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. State Compensation Insurance AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals· 1989-02-21· cited 6×
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals· 1991-06-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.