Skip to main content

Clifton v. Koontz

Citations

  • 325 S.W.2d 684
  • 160 Tex. 82
  • 79 A.L.R. 2d 774
  • 2 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 348
  • 10 Oil & Gas Rep. 1109
  • 1959 Tex. LEXIS 624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \[tjhere can be no arbitrary period for determining the question of whether or not a lease has terminated....\
  • stating that field rules at issue “provide for 320-acre units with 10 percent tolerance so that a maximum of 352 acres may be assigned.”
  • discussing the standard to determine whether production in paying quantities was met to sustain lease
  • listing factors influencing reasonable and prudent operator in paying quantities determination to include “depletion of the reservoir”
  • discussing the standard to determine whether production in paying quantities was met to sustain lease
  • considering lease not expressly using term “paying quantities,” but holding that it is “well settled” that the terms “produced” and “produced in paying quantities” have substantially same meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Clifton v. Koontz

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.