Clifton v. Georgia Merit System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disputing but applying the “catch-all” analysis to the phrase “services, programs, or activities”
• disputing but applying the “catch-all” analysis to the phrase “services, programs, or activities”
• disputing but applying the “catch-all” analysis to the phrase “services, programs, or activities”
• “However significant this court’s concerns with allowing employment discrimination claims under Title II, though, it is bound by the prior precedent of this circuit.”
• “Congress did not validly abrogate sovereign immunity with regard to state employment discrimination actions under Title II.”
• “Although state officials literally are ‘persons,’ a suit against a state official in his or her official capacity is not a suit against the official but rather is a suit against the official’s office.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).