Skip to main content
· 4/22/1968

Clifton Thirley Haywood v. United States

Citations

  • 393 F.2d 780
  • 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where general findings made by the district court were inconsistent and confusing and the right of allocution was denied, the case was reversed and remanded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Clayton, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.