Clifford R. Gray, Inc. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 20%-27% addition for profit and overhead was not reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States Ex Rel. Maris Equipment Co. v. Morganti, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2001-09-20· cited 20×
• Crane-Hogan Structural System, Inc. v. State
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-10-07· cited 7×
• E.W. Tompkins Co. v. State
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-07-22· cited 1×
• Cruz v. Coastal Caisson, Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2009-09-23· cited 1×
• CRANE-HOGAN STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, INC v. STATE OF NEW YORK
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-10-07

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berley Industries, Inc. v. City of New York
  New York Court of Appeals· 1978-11-30· cited 81×
• People v. Bowman
  New York Court of Appeals· 1994-11-29· cited 50×
• Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. State
  New York Court of Appeals· 1979-07-03· cited 32×
• Mid-State Precast Systems, Inc. v. Corbetta Construction Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-03-03· cited 18×
• Yonkers Contracting Co. v. New York State Thruway Authority
  New York Court of Appeals· 1969-06-04· cited 6×
• J & K Plumbing & Heating Co. v. State
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-01-16· cited 1×