Cliff v. United States
Citations
- 195 U.S. 159
- 25 S. Ct. 1
- 49 L. Ed. 139
- 1904 U.S. LEXIS 755
Syllabus
<p>In enumerating the ingredients of oleomargarine in section 2 of the act of 1886 as amended in 1902, Congress included not only those substances which', entering into its composition make it suitable for food and form its body but also other ingredients used only for coloring, the purpose being to prevent excluding from the operation of the statute anything in its nature oleomargarine by reason of the addition of a substance not really an ingredient, but serving substantially only for coloring the product yellow. '</p> <p>Under sections 2 and 8 of the act as amended, oleomargarine colored yellow by a small amount of palm oil serving no purpose other than coloration is artificially colored and is subject to the tax of ten cents a pound and does not come within the proviso to section 8 making the tax a quarter of a cent a pound when the oleomargarine is free from artificial coloration that causes it to look like butter of any shade of yellow.</p> <p>One claiming that his oleomargarine is not subject to the higher tax prescribed by section 8 of the oleomargarine act must make it clear that his product is clearly within the scope of the exception stated in the proviso.</p> <p>The finding of a court upon a question of fact is as conclusive as the verdict of a jury and when supported by testimony admitted without objection will not be disturbed by this court.</p>
Judges: Brewer, Harlan, Peckham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.