Clieve W. Lake v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an argument that a party could challenge an agency’s authority to act at any time based on its jurisdictional nature
• upholding finding of unlawful retaliation where employer began disciplining union activists weeks after union election
• rejecting argument that Chairman Pearce was required to recuse himself from a case because his chief counsel, Ellen Dichner, who was screened from the case, had previously represented a party in that same case before Chairman Pearce
• “We ... do not ... make the recusal decision anew; rather, we simply review whether the decision was arbitrary or unreasonable.”
• finding the challenge to an agency's jurisdiction was waived
• “In reviewing the Board’s [remedy] determination, . . . our ‘judicial role is narrow,’ and an order of the Board ‘must be enforced’ if it is rationally ‘consistent[t] with the Act’ and ‘supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).