Clevinger v. Advocacy Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Fourth Amendment is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore applies to both state and federal government actors
• holding that exclusionary rule did not apply to the states
• holding that the Fourth Amendment is incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment
• determining that Fourth Amendment was applicable to states through the Fourteenth Amendment, but only to the extent of protecting against intrusions that “are implicit in the concept of ordered liberty”
• holding the exclusionary rule inapplicable to the states
• holding the exclusionary rule inapplicable to the states

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).