Clevepak Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, although the village court 3 docket noted the termination was “not on the merits,” the circumstances 4 surrounding the termination gave rise to a question of fact over whether the 5 prosecution actually terminated in the plaintiff’s favor
• “[W]here [the final disposition] is not based on the merits, the dispositive inquiry—to be made factually—was found to be whether the failure to proceed implies a lack of reasonable grounds for the prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).