· 3/3/1961
Clevenger v. Clevenger
Citations
- 189 Cal. App. 2d 658
- 11 Cal. Rptr. 707
- 90 A.L.R. 2d 569
- 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2232
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting these four criteria as covering the representation and reliance elements of equitable estoppel in the paternity context
- interpreting these four criteria as covering the representation and reliance elements of equitable estoppel in the paternity context
- court noted that husband’s representation that he was the father deprived the child of mother’s potential action to hold natural father liable for support
- court noted that husband's representation that he was the father deprived the child of mother's potential action to hold natural father liable for support
- ten-year paternal relationship might give rise to equitable adoption, in contrast to “relationship of some passing days”
- court held record before it was insufficient to establish estoppel, but pointed out facts necessary to establish estoppel where husband asserts illegitimacy in denying support obligation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tobriner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.