Skip to main content
· 3/3/1961

Clevenger v. Clevenger

Citations

  • 189 Cal. App. 2d 658
  • 11 Cal. Rptr. 707
  • 90 A.L.R. 2d 569
  • 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting these four criteria as covering the representation and reliance elements of equitable estoppel in the paternity context
  • interpreting these four criteria as covering the representation and reliance elements of equitable estoppel in the paternity context
  • court noted that husband’s representation that he was the father deprived the child of mother’s potential action to hold natural father liable for support
  • court noted that husband's representation that he was the father deprived the child of mother's potential action to hold natural father liable for support
  • ten-year paternal relationship might give rise to equitable adoption, in contrast to “relationship of some passing days”
  • court held record before it was insufficient to establish estoppel, but pointed out facts necessary to establish estoppel where husband asserts illegitimacy in denying support obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tobriner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.