Skip to main content
· 6/28/1991

Cleveland Wrecking Co. v. Central National Bank

Citations

  • 576 N.E.2d 1055
  • 216 Ill. App. 3d 279
  • 160 Ill. Dec. 101
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that deposition costs of two witnesses were not indispensable because the witnesses had not died or disappeared
  • concluding that deposition costs of two witnesses were not indispensable because the witnesses had not died or disappeared
  • providing that a party’s claim that the opposing party “waived its objection to the denial of its motion to strike by failing to renew such objection following the amended complaint is not supported by the case law”
  • even assuming extrinsic evidence of precontract negotiations was erroneously admitted by trial court in construing contract, error is harmless as long as court gave contract language a plain and unambiguous interpretation
  • even assuming extrinsic evidence of precontract negotiations was erroneously admitted by trial court in construing contract, error is harmless as long as court gave contract language a plain and unambiguous interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNULTY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.