Skip to main content
· 2/4/2021

Cleveland v. Imrie

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 308

Syllabus

Sufficient evidence, manifest weight of the evidence, voyeurism, criminal trespass, and invasion of privacy. The evidence was sufficient to prove that the appellant committed voyeurism when he placed his cellphone under the victim's restroom stall and recorded her. His conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence because, in reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, it was clear that the trial court did not lose its way or create a manifest miscarriage of justice in finding the appellant guilty. In addition, the state was not required to prove that the appellant committed criminal trespass, only that he invaded the privacy of the victim.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.