Skip to main content
· 4/30/2002

Cleveland v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 562 S.E.2d 696
  • 38 Va. App. 199
  • 2002 Va. App. LEXIS 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming an inconsistent bench trial verdict because the trial court offered a valid explanation on the record for rendering its decision and apparently considered the ruling to be an act of lenity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Willis, Clements

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.