Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an economic or financial benefit alone is insufficient to satisfy the public- use requirement of Article I, § 19 of the Ohio Constitution
• discussing “the limitations of public use and compensation” in the federal and state constitutions
• free speech case involving a prohibition on pick eting on private property
• “[A]lmost every state constitution eventually included provisions related to eminent- domain powers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).