Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. City of Cleveland
Citations
- 235 U.S. 50
- 35 S. Ct. 21
- 59 L. Ed. 127
- 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1035
Syllabus
<p>In order to bring a case to this court under § 237, Judicial Code, the Federal right must have been set up and adjudicated against the claimant by the judgment of the state court; nor can the contention made and passed upon by the state court be enlarged , by .assignments of error to bring the case to this court.</p> <p>An impairment of the obligation of the contract within the meaning of § 10, of Art. I of the Federal Constitution must be by subsequent legislation and not by mere change in judicial decision.</p> <p>A certificate of the state court cannot bring .an additional Federal question into the record, if the record does not otherwise show it to exist. Marvin v. Trout, 199 U. S. 212.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is equally well settled that an impairment of the obligation of the contract, within the meaning of the Federal Constitution, must be by subsequent legislation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day, Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.