Cleve Marsh Hunt Club v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of FCRA claims where “inaccuracies in [plaintiff’s] credit reports [] had no bearing on her credit- worthiness”
• declining to extend jurisdiction over defendant’s state-law counterclaims because the district court’s choice to do so is purely discretionary
• pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “service of other papers ‘must be made on the attorney’ if the party is represented by an attorney”
• “the correct reporting of Plaintiff's telephone number and additional address has no bearing on Plaintiff's credit worthiness or eligibility for credit, and therefore the alleged inaccuracies are not actionable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).