Cletis Meredith Miller v. William Bolger, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and the United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs did not attack FECA determination in subsequent suit where right to receive FECA benefits and amount of benefits were not at issue
• reaching the same conclusion with respect to whether recovery under FECA precludes an action under Title VII
• discussing the differences between the relief available under FECA and Title VII
• separating workers' compensation damages from damages for workplace-retaliation claim under Title VII
• “Congress did not intend that recovery for tortious injury under FECA should preclude Title VII remedies for discrimination.”
• “FECA was intended only to be a substitute for suits against the United States for tortious injury” and nowhere in legislative history “is there any mention of FECA recovery as precluding actions for discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).